The State of Ohio and Smith agree that through May 4, 2020, 166 days of speedy trial time elapsed. 12 The defense had moved for a continuance due to the COVID 19 pandemic, which …

Today, this court is tasked with determining the legal effect of a juvenile court’s order transferring (“binding over”) charges filed in juvenile court to the jurisdiction of the general division of the …

such evidence in this case violated Smith’s rights under the Ohio and United States Constitutions. The First District Court of Appeals affirmed Smith’s convictions.

Smith was found guilty and sentenced accordingly. On appeal, the Eighth District Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's decision, finding that B.B.'s statements to the police were …

Smith, 2008-Ohio-3717, at ¶ 63-65. {¶ 9} We accepted jurisdiction over Smith s discretionary appeal and the proposition that the Fourth Amendment prohibits the warrantless search of …

3 days ago · And he faulted the lower court for mischaracterizing the state court’s ruling. The 6th Circuit’s mistakes “have real consequences,” Thomas complained, requiring the state to retry …

Dec 23, 2024 · State v. Bollar, 2022-Ohio-4370, ¶ 19. Here, the jury found Smith guilty of four felony offenses, three of which are listed in R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(g), to wit: attempted murder …

Mar 5, 1990 · Contrary to the State's argument, a citizen who attempts to protect his private property from inspection, after throwing it on a car to respond to a police officer's inquiry, …

Appellant was sixteen years old when he was charged with committing the category-two offense of aggravated robbery while possessing a deadly weapon. Binding Appellant over to adult …

{¶ 2} By indictment filed March 7, 1989, plaintiff-appellee, State of Ohio, charged Smith with three counts of aggravated murder in violation of R.C. 2903.01, unclassified felonies (each with four …